Methodology

A quick, honest walkthrough of how the pension-vs-equity math works, and what it deliberately leaves out.

1. FERS pension

Annual pension = multiplier × years of service × high-3 salary. The multiplier is 1.0% for most retirements and 1.1% if you retire at 62 or later with at least 20 years of service.

Years of service at retirement = years already served + (retirement age − current age). High-3 is the average of your three highest-paid consecutive years; we let you enter it directly so the calculations apply whether you're GS-13, GS-15, or SES.

2. Lifetime pension value

Lifetime value = annual pension × years drawing it. Default is 25 years (retire at 57, draw to 82). We do not model COLA. We skip COLA. COLAs track inflation anyway, and you're comparing nominal dollars on both sides.

3. Tech path - Big Tech

Cash = (base + bonus) × years. Equity = a fresh RSU grant every year, valued at annualGrant at grant date, then compounded at your chosen growth rate until the end of the horizon. This mirrors how Meta, Google, Amazon, and similar pay senior ICs and managers, with annual "refresh" grants on top of the initial sign-on grant.

Default 8%/yr is the long run S&P average. Individual Big Tech stocks have done much more. Or much less. Use the slider if you want to reality check a different rate.

4. Tech path - Startup that IPOs

One equity grant at join. At the exit year, the grant value multiplies by your exitMultiple. Proceeds then compound at the growth rate for the remaining years. After exit, we assume Big-Tech-style annual RSU refreshes (post-IPO companies start paying like Big Tech).

To model "the startup didn't IPO," set the exit multiple to 0. The cash side is unchanged - that's the point: even if the equity goes to zero, you've still earned real money for years.

5. What's NOT modeled (and why it doesn't change the conclusion)

  • TSP balance. You'd have one in either path; tech 401(k) match is usually larger.
  • Social Security. Same on both sides for most career-feds.
  • Taxes. Federal pension is ordinary income; long-held RSUs/IPO proceeds get long-term capital gains treatment. Taxes favor the tech side.
  • FEHB vs. tech health insurance. Not included in the math at all. FEHB in retirement is a genuine benefit; partially offsets the gap but rarely closes it.
  • Survivor / disability benefits. Genuine, but small relative to the wealth gap.
  • RSU dilution, market downside, unvested grants if you quit. Genuine risks. Stress-test with the growth slider and a 0× startup exit.

Use this for orders of magnitude. Most feds massively overestimate what their pension is worth and massively underestimate what equity does over a decade of compounding.

Sources & notes

  • FEHB in retirement: Assumption that FEHB is a genuine benefit that partially offsets the gap but rarely closes it is based on OPM data showing FEHB premium subsidies and typical retiree costs compared to private-sector ACA or employer plans. The decision to exclude it from the math is intentional - modeling exact FEHB vs. tech health-insurance costs requires individual plan selection, state subsidies, and years-to-Medicare, all of which vary too widely to generalize cleanly.
  • Pension multipliers (1.0% / 1.1%): Standard FERS formula per OPM regulations (5 U.S.C. 8415).
  • 8% equity growth assumption: Approximate long run nominal return of the S&P 500 (1928-2023 average, dividend-adjusted). Used as a neutral benchmark, not a prediction for any specific stock or year.

Found a number that looks off, or want to talk through what it means for your transition? Book a free 15-min intro call.